Doctoral Thesis · 2026 → · Supervised by Thierry Giasson

Framing AI in Canadian political documents, 2017–2026.

“How is AI framed in Canadian political discourse, by which actors, and how do these framings transform between 2017 and 2026?” — a supervised machine-learning approach, transposing the CCF methodology to the federal parliamentary and strategic corpus.

AI 2017–2026
8 frames
Thematic categories
6 actors
Messenger types
4 stances
Evaluative framings
κ · AC1
Intercoder validation
Point of departure

2017: a turning point.

The Pan-Canadian AI Strategy marks the first time the federal government treats AI as an object of public policy. It is the anchor from which the corpus is built — the equivalent of the CCF project’s “1978” — and the reference point against which the evolution of framings is measured.

  • 2017

    Pan-Canadian Artificial Intelligence Strategy

    CIFAR / ISED. The founding document: AI becomes a federal policy object.

  • 2019

    Directive on Automated Decision-Making

    Treasury Board rules for algorithmic decisions within the federal administration.

  • 2022

    AI Strategic Plan · AIDA (Bill C-27)

    First attempt at a Canadian legislative framework for artificial intelligence.

  • 2024

    National AI Strategy consultation

    Public consultation and briefs feeding into the future national strategy.

  • 2026

    National strategy “AI for All”

    The closing milestone of the period under study.

Methodological framework

A four-phase computational pipeline.

The pipeline is taken directly from the CCF methodology and transposed to the scale of the Canadian corpus. Validation relies on intercoder agreement — Cohen’s κ and Gwet’s AC1.

Phase · 01

Corpus construction

Collection of the sources and sentence-level segmentation with spaCy; structured storage in PostgreSQL.

Phase · 02

Semi-manual annotation

A gold standard of 500–1,000 passages, annotated with LLM-assisted tooling and Doccano.

Phase · 03

Supervised classification

BERT (EN) and CamemBERT (FR) trained on the gold-standard sample.

Phase · 04

Diachronic analysis

Quantified measurement of the shift in dominant framings across 2017–2026.

Data sources

A corpus in five strata.

The corpus is hypothetical at this stage — volumes remain to be confirmed, and passages genuinely related to AI will be filtered beforehand.

01

Parliamentary debates

Main corpus. Hansard — House, committees (INDU, ETHI, SECU, RNNR), Senate · 50,000–200,000 passages.

ourcommons.ca · parl.ca · XML
02

Strategic documents

2017 Strategy, 2022 Plan, Directive on Automated Decision-Making, AIDA (Bill C-27), “AI for All” 2026.

canada.ca · ised-isde.canada.ca
03

Consultations & briefs

AIDA, 2024 National Strategy consultation, briefs submitted to committees.

consultations · canada.ca
04

Speeches & addresses

Speeches from the Throne, federal budgets, ministerial addresses (ISED, TBS, PS).

canada.ca · House archives
05

Advisory reports

AI Advisory Council, Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Senate committee reports.

lop.parl.ca
Intellectual contribution

The annotation scheme.

The first AI × politics annotation scheme adapted to the bilingual Canadian context. Each sentence can carry multiple labels: thematic frames, messengers and evaluative stances.

Hansard · Minister (Government) — annotated example

Artificial intelligence represents a major economic opportunityEconomic · Opportunity for Canada, but we must protect privacyEthics and prevent algorithmic discriminationRisk as well as disinformationSecurity.

Thematic frames · 8
Economic Security Ethics & rights Scientific-technical Regulation Sovereignty Labour Health
Actors / messengers · 6
Researchers Civil servants Companies Civil society International organisations Political parties
Evaluative framings · 4
Opportunity Risk Urgency Neutrality
Trigger events
National strategies Bills Incidents (ChatGPT) Summits (G7, Bletchley)
Analytical scope

The analyses this corpus makes possible.

Beyond the when: the corpus captures who frames AI, how, why and with what effects.

01

Actors & framings

Who speaks and how: Liberals vs Conservatives, ISED vs Treasury Board, Mila vs Microsoft.

02

Authority networks

NER and co-citations: Bengio framed as “ethics”, OpenAI as “threat” or “opportunity”.

03

Federal geography

Framings by province and institution; jurisdictional tensions over AI.

04

Agenda-setting

Trigger events and attention peaks: the ChatGPT effect in the House.

05

Priority at the top

Which frames reach the Speech from the Throne and the federal budget.

06

Inter-party comparison

NDP / labour, Bloc / sovereignty, Conservatives / competitiveness.

07

Discursive polarisation

Is AI becoming divisive like climate, or does it remain consensual?

08 · Novel avenue

Discursive cascades

Tracing a framing from brief to committee, to minister, then to bill.

Conclusion

Contributions and next steps.

Contributions

What the thesis brings

The first AI × politics annotation scheme adapted to the bilingual Canadian context · a quantified measurement of the shift in framings, 2017 → 2026 · an open, reusable computational corpus.

Next steps

Roadmap

01 Build the Hansard corpus (XML) · 02 Annotate the gold standard (Doccano) · 03 Train and validate the classifiers · 04 Analyse the diachronic trajectory.